At the end of the day, it is not unusual that self-determination for one group leads to a conflict with another group - this has happened many times in history. With regard to other refugee groups from the 1940s, it is worth noting that they were typically integrated in the (new) borders of their home country, and were encouraged to give up claims to their hometowns that ended up in another country. Displaced Germans for instance ended up in either the FRG or the GDR, but they ultimately had to give up their claims to Silesia and East Prussia. The same applied for every other European country, and was confirmed by the Helsinki Final Act in the 1970s. With regard to the Palestinian refugees, it is worth noting that 80% of them already live in either the West Bank or Gaza, or they live in Jordan as Jordanian citizens - in both cases they would not be considered refugees in other parts of the world.
Advocating for a single state is not necessarily antisemitic, but I struggle to see how this could remotely be workable. Two nations with wildly different historic narratives would be thrown into one country. The most likely outcome would be that they would try to outcompete to each other, and this would ultimately culminate in a new conflict, partition, and refugee flows once again. In other words 1948 all over again.
At the end of the day, it is not unusual that self-determination for one group leads to a conflict with another group - this has happened many times in history. With regard to other refugee groups from the 1940s, it is worth noting that they were typically integrated in the (new) borders of their home country, and were encouraged to give up claims to their hometowns that ended up in another country. Displaced Germans for instance ended up in either the FRG or the GDR, but they ultimately had to give up their claims to Silesia and East Prussia. The same applied for every other European country, and was confirmed by the Helsinki Final Act in the 1970s. With regard to the Palestinian refugees, it is worth noting that 80% of them already live in either the West Bank or Gaza, or they live in Jordan as Jordanian citizens - in both cases they would not be considered refugees in other parts of the world.
Advocating for a single state is not necessarily antisemitic, but I struggle to see how this could remotely be workable. Two nations with wildly different historic narratives would be thrown into one country. The most likely outcome would be that they would try to outcompete to each other, and this would ultimately culminate in a new conflict, partition, and refugee flows once again. In other words 1948 all over again.